<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hyperlinking best practices, pt. 1: Visual presentation of links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://underscorebleach.net/jotsheet/2004/12/hyperlink-usability/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://underscorebleach.net/jotsheet/2004/12/hyperlink-usability</link>
	<description>I'm pretty good at wasting your time.  By Tom Sherman.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://underscorebleach.net/jotsheet/2004/12/hyperlink-usability#comment-1602</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www445.pair.com/tps115/jotsheet/?p=298#comment-1602</guid>
		<description>You can see the difference in border rendering in IE with thicker borders - for dotted, it renders little circles. For dashed, it renders little rectangles.

For 1px and 2px borders it simply clips the circles so they look identical to the dashes.

Yes, this is retarded.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can see the difference in border rendering in IE with thicker borders - for dotted, it renders little circles. For dashed, it renders little rectangles.</p>
<p>For 1px and 2px borders it simply clips the circles so they look identical to the dashes.</p>
<p>Yes, this is retarded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh (A differnt one)</title>
		<link>http://underscorebleach.net/jotsheet/2004/12/hyperlink-usability#comment-1601</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh (A differnt one)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2005 19:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www445.pair.com/tps115/jotsheet/?p=298#comment-1601</guid>
		<description>Awsome article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awsome article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom sherman</title>
		<link>http://underscorebleach.net/jotsheet/2004/12/hyperlink-usability#comment-1600</link>
		<dc:creator>tom sherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 05:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www445.pair.com/tps115/jotsheet/?p=298#comment-1600</guid>
		<description>You're possibly right on the overkill comment... but I'll explain the logic of that spade thing a little better in an upcoming post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re possibly right on the overkill comment&#8230; but I&#8217;ll explain the logic of that spade thing a little better in an upcoming post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://underscorebleach.net/jotsheet/2004/12/hyperlink-usability#comment-1599</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 05:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www445.pair.com/tps115/jotsheet/?p=298#comment-1599</guid>
		<description>I like the angled arrow but IMO the spade is overkill. Nevertheless... nice work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the angled arrow but IMO the spade is overkill. Nevertheless&#8230; nice work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
