Comments on: A more accurate map of the 2004 election results http://underscorebleach.net/jotsheet/2004/11/more-accurate-2004-election-map I'm pretty good at wasting your time. By Tom Sherman. Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:34:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: MassMike http://underscorebleach.net/jotsheet/2004/11/more-accurate-2004-election-map#comment-1157 MassMike Sat, 08 Apr 2006 13:04:26 +0000 http://www445.pair.com/tps115/jotsheet/?p=246#comment-1157 The skewed maps prove one thing were population is high the Welfare and illegal aliens are highest as well. That is the true difference between the parties. Workers (red colors and a more conservative view), non workers and union members (Blue colors and a more socialist view). A conservative view in this case: let me use my money as I see fit. A socialist view in this case: Let me use your money they way I see fit. The skewed maps prove one thing were population is high the Welfare and illegal aliens are highest as well. That is the true difference between the parties. Workers (red colors and a more conservative view), non workers and union members (Blue colors and a more socialist view).

A conservative view in this case: let me use my money as I see fit.

A socialist view in this case: Let me use your money they way I see fit.

]]> By: Jeffery Nall http://underscorebleach.net/jotsheet/2004/11/more-accurate-2004-election-map#comment-1156 Jeffery Nall Sat, 18 Mar 2006 22:54:05 +0000 http://www445.pair.com/tps115/jotsheet/?p=246#comment-1156 What I see in the above picture Map #1 Red States win, blue states lose. Map #2 Red States win, blue states lose. Map #3 Red States win, blue states lose. No mater how much you play with the data, Red states win, blue states lose. What I see in the above picture

Map #1 Red States win, blue states lose.
Map #2 Red States win, blue states lose.
Map #3 Red States win, blue states lose.

No mater how much you play with the data, Red states win, blue states lose.

]]> By: Dave http://underscorebleach.net/jotsheet/2004/11/more-accurate-2004-election-map#comment-1155 Dave Wed, 07 Sep 2005 02:10:57 +0000 http://www445.pair.com/tps115/jotsheet/?p=246#comment-1155 yeah, if you want to be technical, your idea for that map is right. but the state by state and county by county map is just that. an area by area map and no one thinks that those areas are as highly populated as the areas that voted dem. MI was for Bush by dang near 20%. Throw in Wayne and Livingston counties and the tables were turned and Bush was down by 20%. It's just interesting to see what counties vote for whom as well as states as a whole. yeah, if you want to be technical, your idea for that map is right. but the state by state and county by county map is just that. an area by area map and no one thinks that those areas are as highly populated as the areas that voted dem.

MI was for Bush by dang near 20%. Throw in Wayne and Livingston counties and the tables were turned and Bush was down by 20%. It’s just interesting to see what counties vote for whom as well as states as a whole.

]]>