Comments on: Apache Directory Indexes 101 http://underscorebleach.net/jotsheet/2004/01/apache-indexes-101 I'm pretty good at wasting your time. By Tom Sherman. Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:13:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: tom sherman http://underscorebleach.net/jotsheet/2004/01/apache-indexes-101#comment-275 tom sherman Wed, 07 Sep 2005 17:31:55 +0000 http://www445.pair.com/tps115/jotsheet/?p=43#comment-275 Quin: Ah, interesting! A bit before my time. :) (Just slightly, though.) Quin: Ah, interesting! A bit before my time. :) (Just slightly, though.)

]]> By: Quin http://underscorebleach.net/jotsheet/2004/01/apache-indexes-101#comment-274 Quin Wed, 07 Sep 2005 16:33:34 +0000 http://www445.pair.com/tps115/jotsheet/?p=43#comment-274 Thought I'd chuck this your way seeing as your page helped me. The 'Header' and 'Readme' files date back to BBS days. That should give you a little hint as to why they're there (or named like that). Thought I’d chuck this your way seeing as your page helped me. The ‘Header’ and ‘Readme’ files date back to BBS days. That should give you a little hint as to why they’re there (or named like that).

]]> By: Tony http://underscorebleach.net/jotsheet/2004/01/apache-indexes-101#comment-273 Tony Wed, 02 Feb 2005 10:35:31 +0000 http://www445.pair.com/tps115/jotsheet/?p=43#comment-273 Whoops, just saw Apache Directory Indexes 201. You might want to mention here that the last bit is wrong, or make the note up the top bright red, since I didn't notice it and this is the page that appears when googling for "apache directory listing", not the other one. Whoops, just saw Apache Directory Indexes 201. You might want to mention here that the last bit is wrong, or make the note up the top bright red, since I didn’t notice it and this is the page that appears when googling for “apache directory listing”, not the other one.

]]> By: Tony http://underscorebleach.net/jotsheet/2004/01/apache-indexes-101#comment-272 Tony Wed, 02 Feb 2005 10:30:47 +0000 http://www445.pair.com/tps115/jotsheet/?p=43#comment-272 > We've got an HTML 3.2 DOCTYPE that's not going away Don't know if you could do this when the article was written, but <a href="http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_autoindex.html#indexoptions:suppresshtmlpreamble" rel="nofollow">here</a>'s how to suppress the default HTML preamble. > We’ve got an HTML 3.2 DOCTYPE that’s not going away

Don’t know if you could do this when the article was written, but here’s how to suppress the default HTML preamble.

]]>